 
 
 
 
 
 
PRACTICE AREAS:
Military Law
Flying Evaluation Board
Medical Malpractice
Expungement
Law Office of Kenneth David, P.A.
2003 Apalachee Pkwy. Suite 202A
Tallahassee, FL. 32301
Phone:(850)681-7222
Fax: (850)514-4400
Email
|
FAQs: Criminal Defense
Military investigators have approached me to ask me questions. They’ve told they only want to find the truth and that I don’t need a lawyer. Is that true?
My commander called me into his office and told me I tested positive for an illegal drug on a urinalysis. Is there any way to win this kind of case?
What is the "presumption of innocence?"
Can I get a fair shake in a military court-martial?
If I hire a civilian attorney for my military case, can I still have a military lawyer work for me?
What does it cost to hire a civilian military counsel?
An Article 15 or nonjudicial punishment (also known as
a Captain’s Mast in the Navy) is offered to military members for minor offenses (what the civilian courts might
term “misdemeanors”). If you accept an Article 15 you’re only accepting the forum and not admitting guilt. You
could go in front of your commander and tell him or her you’re not guilty. In that case, you can present your side
to him or her and even bring witnesses to testify on your behalf. In that case, the commander will determine whether
you’re guilty or not. I’ve had commanders actually throw out Article 15s for my clients after hearing the evidence.
However, many commanders aren’t impartial and have already made up their minds that the military member
committed the offense. In that case, you may want to turn down the Article 15 and ask for a court-martial.
It may depend on the possible consequences you face. An Article 15 could be the first step in an administrative
discharge, the loss of a stripe or some of your retirement pension, or could end any hope you have for future
promotions. This is when an experienced military attorney is important to let you know your options and the risks.
Back to Top
Absolutely not true. Unfortunately, most military investigators are merely a
part of the government’s prosecution team. They can legally lie to you and will trick you. You may find out the hard way that
what you really told them in an interrogation may be completely different than what they later say you told them. Nothing makes
an investigator more upset than four little words – “I want a lawyer.” Ask for an attorney immediately and often whenever an
investigator reads you your Article 31 (Miranda) rights. The best
advice I can give you is this: “Keep your mouth shut and call an attorney ASAP.”
Back to Top
The government has to prove you had an illegal drug in your body
and that you knowingly ingested the drug. I’ve won cases in which the prosecution could not prove beyond a reasonable
doubt that the military member knowingly ingested the drug. However, I highly recommend you don’t speak to
anyone but your lawyer if someone tells you that you tested positive.
The presumption of innocence, coupled with the fact that the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt
beyond a reasonable doubt (see below), makes it difficult for the government to put people behind bars.
Back to Top
All people accused of a crime are legally presumed to be innocent until they are convicted, either in a
trial or as a result of pleading guilty. This presumption means not only that the prosecutor must convince the jury of the
efendant's guilt, but also that the defendant need not say or do anything in his own defense. If the prosecutor can't
convince the jury that the defendant is guilty, the defendant goes free.
The presumption of innocence, coupled with the fact that the prosecutor must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable
doubt (see below), makes it difficult for the government to put people behind bars.
Back to Top
An experienced military defense attorney can certainly help you even up the odds. Although the
military and civilian criminal courts have similar concepts of presumption of innocence and the “beyond a reasonable doubt”
burden of proof, there are some major differences that lead to a perception of unfairness. First, the base legal office
(which includes the prosecution team) recommends which jurors should be picked for any court-martial and only 2/3 of
those jurors are required to reach a guilty verdict. That’s a huge difference with the civilian court system that
requires a unanimous verdict. Also, military judges are normally individuals who are more favorable (actually much
more favorable) to the prosecution. In spite of those kinds of differences, I personally believe that military members
who sit as jurors want to do the right thing. It’s extremely important that you assemble a defense team that can
uncover facts favorable to you and show the jurors there is a reasonable doubt in your case.
Back to Top
Absolutely. Two heads are better than one and I work with local military counsel to ensure you
get the best possible defense. The local military counsel may have worked with particular commanders, witnesses,
or jurors and will have a better working knowledge of dynamics on the base that may affect your case. However,
you hire a civilian attorney for his or her experience in knowing how to effectively try your case. When you hire
my firm, I will be lead counsel. I take personal responsibility for mapping out your case strategy and arguing your
case to the jury or board.
Back to Top
It all depends on the complexity of your case, the type of charge, and the number of charges against you. I normally
will give you two prices – one lower price if we only go to an Article 32 pretrial investigation and a higher price
if your case is referred to a court-martial. I also charge for the cost of travel to and from the site of any hearing
or court-martial and the cost of billeting.
Back to Top
The Law Office of Kenneth David confidently represents current and former members of the United States Armed Forces and their families stationed throughout the country and overseas and civilian clients located in the Panhandle of Florida communities of Tallahassee, Quincy and Monticello.
Welcome l Representative Cases l Attorney Profile l FAQs l Resource Links l Contact Us
© 2008 Kenneth David Law. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
2008- Website Diner
|